October 16, 2004


  • This photo was taken the day after Marcia Gay Harden won her Academy Award © in 2001.


    It's hung up in my office to remind me everyday what I'm striving towards.  


    The part I love about the photo is: Nobody is paying attention to the Oscar.  


    Instead, the focal point is on the parent engaged in conversation with the real achievement sitting on their lap.  Meanwhile, your other half is reading a newspaper on a lazy Sunday morning -- incidentally about your win the night before.


    It beautifully encapsulates that perfect balance.  Where the statue symbolizes being at the top of your game but still not distracting you from the real things that matter most.  

October 14, 2004


  • Awww...


    I just saw this on the "Tru Calling" message boards.  A bunch of fans sent this cake to the set on the last day of shooting.


    Darn, I was already home by then!  


    I want me a slice of that! 


     

October 12, 2004

  • In January 1979, my father took me to see my very first film in a movie theater.   And for 127 minutes, a 5 year-old boy sat on a red velvet seat in front of a 30-foot screen and truly believed a man could fly.   That film of course was, "Superman".



    I realize in his later years Christopher Reeve was attempting to "escape the cape" but he always demonstrated to me all the places you could go as an actor.  The skies were the limit... which he proverbially proved.


    If you haven't seen Christopher Reeve's screen test on the "Superman" DVD, you should.  It reveals this serious Julliard trained actor, just having a lot of fun.   And the film still holds up today without it being cheesy.  Now that's talent.


    When I was searching for photos of him,  I came upon this one and had to look no further. 


    Because that winter day in the theater sparked off a 5 year-old boy's imagination and lifelong pursuit to bring others the same kind of excitment he felt 25 years ago.  



    I think that cape will be finding a place in my new house afterall.  Thanks for jumpstarting a dream Mr. Reeve.  Up, up and... away.  (Cue Trumpets from John William's "Superman Theme" now)


     25 September 1952 - 10 October 2004

October 10, 2004

  • Usually when I have an idea for a screenplay, I start working on it when I hop into bed for the night.  And I go into that state where you're slumbering but still conscious to not be dreaming and dozing off into La-La Land.  Then I basically work through a rough outline of the Beginning, Middle and End -- solving any holes in the story.  Once I have it all sorted out, I  pop out of bed and crank out a synopsis before I forget it.


    Last night was one of those nights where inspiration hit and I had to wake up at 3am to pound it out.  Remember when I said "Professionals perform on demand, amateurs perform only when inspired"? Amateur screenwriter here.  But writing, has always seemed to work for me that way.  I can't set aside the same timeframe diligently everyday like the pros do.


    Anyway after I was done, I dug out my favorite screenwriting book and started re-reading some pages.  I almost forgot how good it was.  You know how I use this site to chronicle the day-to-day of an actor by being honest about everything?  Well, William Goldman does that in his book.  He has no qualms about who he'll talk about and is refreshingly candid, hiding nothing.   He wrote: "Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid", "All the President's Men", "Misery" and "The Princess Bride" just to name a few.  And he goes into explicit detail of the nightmares/process it took to make each film and he doesn't pull any punches--no agent, actor, director or producer's name is safe from being mentioned whether in a positive or negative light.


    At the end of the book, he posts a first draft of a screenplay he's  written and has you formulate your thoughts on it.  (I personally thought it was already pretty decent to start with.)  But then he has the biggest screenwriters in the business tear it apart (Callie Khouri "Thelma & Louise", Tony Gilroy "Bourne Identity", "Bourne Supremacy", The Farrelly Brothers, Playwright John Patrick Shanely, and Scott Frank "Little Man Tate", "Get Shorty", "Out of Sight", "Minority Report") and you get to read their detailed comments to him on what works and what doesn't--and they don't go easy on him!


    It's just so practical and tosses book-smart theory out the door.  It's a fun read and provides so much insight even if you're not looking to be a screenwriter.  You always learn the most from the writings that are candid about every and anything.  

October 8, 2004

  • HOME SWEET HOME


    Before we start, let me just state that "Yes, I know I'm a geek".  Wait, scratch that.  I mean, "I know I'm probably going to be perceived as a geek".   Because if I were ashamed, I wouldn't post this in the first place, right? 


    I've always been a huge fan of comics, own a big collection, worked at Marvel and am extremely glad films like "Spider-Man" and "X-Men" are now doing the stories justice.  I think comics blended into my interest of films/TV because if you've ever read a comic, it's very much story boarded like a movie.  Even the way the panels are drawn subconsciously changes the mood of the storytelling.  Anyway, no more justification.


    My wife and I are planning on buying a new house and we'll be in this one for awhile.  Then it got me thinking all the things I've always wanted in my house if money were no object -- which it is.  But if I were "Oprah Winfrey" rich, this is what I'd have commissioned & acquired immediately:


    1)  A beautiful office/library (like Anthony Hopkins' in "Meet Joe Black").  It would have a bust of William Shakespeare and when you flipped open his hinged head, a button would activate a bookcase to slide open -- revealing two fireman poles.  (Like Adam West and Burt Ward's in the 60's "Batman" TV show.)  


    2) The poles would lead down at least 2 stories into the garage.  The garage wouldn't look like the TV show's underground cave but more like the "X-Men" 's garage with marble floors.   However, I still want the show's secret cave entrance that is camouflaged by a retracting bush.   Anyway, stored down there would be the family car (Porche Cayenne), my personal car (Aston Martin Vanquish) and wife's car (BMW 745i).  But my prized possessions would be:  The original 1960's Batmobile and K.I.T.T. from "Knight Rider" complete with working gadgets/monitors on the inside and red "woo-woo" side to side LED thingy on the outside.


                                                                                  


    Those two automobiles would be my first priority and then I'd maybe work on getting "The Dukes of Hazzard" General Lee and "Starsky and Hutch" Torino later.


    3) Going back into the office/library (although I'd have to figure out a way to get back up the fireman poles first) -- housed in glass cases and lit by overhead spotlights would be replica props from various comics/films: Christopher Reeve's Superman Cape, Iron Man's Helmet, "The Rocketeer"'s Helmet, Captain America's shield mounted on a wall, the T100's endo arm from "T2", William Wallace's "Braveheart" sword, Count Dooku's "Attack of the Clones" lightsaber, broken pieces of Aragon's Narsil sword and The One Ring both from "The Lord of the Rings" and Boba Fett Helmet.





     


     


     


     



     


     


     


     


    Now, I saw on the Net a lot of uber-dorks who have all this stuff in one room.  The key is to hang and light it in an elegant room; treating them like artwork and unlike a Dungeons & Dragons hermit would by cramming it into one room all nilly-willy.


    4) On the desk, I'd have a red phone under a glass cake cover reserved only for urgent calls.  The only people that would have the number would be my immediate family and agent.  And when I lift up the receiver, it automatically dials out to my local pizza joint that delivered the closest NYC tasting pies. 


    5) I'd also own a water fountain that dispenses Hawaiian Punch like in "Mr. Deeds".  However, mine would trickle out Fruitworks Fruit Punch instead.


    6) The middle section of the grand staircase would lift open like a hatch just as "The Munster's" did where they kept their pet dragon 'Spot'.   However in my home, it'd simply be for storage and/or the kid's secret hideout.  A couple in Waxahachie, Texas actually built an entire replica of "The Munster's House" that included this feature.


    7) Then just random secret passageways throughout the house to use as shortcuts or escape routes like in "Webster".  Your standard 'fireplace that spins into another room/grandfather clock swinging open into a sub-basement/sliding wall panels leading behind a hung portrait so you can look through its eyes' kind of stuff.   


    I don't know when any of the above is going to happen though since I'm having trouble convincing my wife for a plain 'ole pool table.  But mark my words, someday I will at least have that sliding bookcase and batpoles leading down to my current Acura TSX!

October 6, 2004

  • SCRIPT UPDATE


    My co-writer George and I just got our notes back from our 2nd draft.  The feedback from our producer was very favorable and now we're working on delivering the 3rd draft -- nothing major, very superficial changes that can be done in a few days.  A week tops.


    However, the notes from the production company's board members' such as: "She shouldn't die on this page" were very puzzling -- because the character being referred to doesn't die.  So either the script was skimmed through very quickly or George and I need to make that stuff clearer, I suppose.  Anyway, it's no big deal, our main contact likes it pretty much "as is" and everything seems to be right on schedule. 


    As you all may know, my show on FOX, "Tru Calling", had an order of 13 episodes.  They stopped production at 6 and plan to possibly air them in 2005.  If those episodes do well, there's a chance it may keep going.   John Cho's show on NBC, "The Men's Room", also had an order of 13 episodes.  Last Wednesday they had their production stopped at 6 to possibly air in 2005.  And if those episodes do well, there's a chance it may keep going.  We both have seem to have acquired the television touch of death.


    Don't forget to check out Asia Street Comedy tonight on the International Channel: Wednesdays, 8:30 p.m. Pacific time (11:30 p.m. Eastern time), repeats on Mondays, 9 p.m. Pacific time (Midnight Eastern time)

October 4, 2004

  • Asia Street Comedy


    I will be in several episodes this season of a new show called "Asia Street Comedy" on The International Channel starting to air this Wed, October 6th


    It's a SNL-esque sketch comedy show with a predominately Asian American cast.  I did about 15 sketches to help them get off the ground and it was just a fun way to pass the summer.


    In one sketch, I was a cell phone engineer getting in trouble for creating ring tones that terrified customers, such as ear-piercing screams from a woman.


    Another sketch we spoofed Robert Kiyosaki's successful financial self-help book, 'Rich Dad, Poor Dad".  However in our version, "Rich Son, Poor Dad",  it taught the lessons of mooching off your offspring as a retirement opportunity.


    And yet another sketch had me in a reality show called, "Buried Alive" where 2 guys see who can last the longest in a coffin underground.  At one point, I do a "confessional cam" and talk smack about the other participant.  Meanwhile his face turns into my confessional cam saying, "Hey, numbnuts!  I'm right here.  I can hear everything you're saying!"  It's pretty hilarious stuff.  Joy Bisco ("The Debut", "General Hospital") & Bobby Lee ("Mad TV") also did several sketches.


    So if you can get the station, let me know what you think! 


    Asia Street Comedy - International Channel original
    Wednesdays, 8:30 p.m. Pacific time (11:30 p.m. Eastern time), repeats on Mondays, 9 p.m. Pacific time (Midnight Eastern time) -not currently available on DISH and Direct TV-

October 1, 2004

  • FAST FOOD ALL-STARS


    A few days ago, I had a craving for some plain ole', bad for your arteries, fast food.  But I realized I wanted to get a certain item from one restaurant and something else from another restaurant.  The quest would take me driving all over town for food, hence negating the "fast" in Fast Food.  But here was my lineup for the perfect fast-food meal:  


    MAIN ENTREE:


    - ARBY'S Roast Beef (w/ Horsey Sause)


                                    OR


    - 5 to 8 WHITE CASTLE Cheesburgers (if on East Coast)


    SIDES:


    - McDONALD'S French Fries 


              AND/OR


    - KFC's Popcorn Chicken



     BEVERAGE:


    - BURGER KING's Cherry Icee


                   OR


    - McDONALD'S Shamrock Shake (in March)


     


    DESSERT:


     


    - WENDY'S Frosty Dessert


       


                    AND/OR


     



     


     


    - McDONALD'S Apple Pie (FRIED like they did in the old days, not baked like today.  I heard it's still fried in Seattle.) 

September 29, 2004

  • Acting Skool - Part III of III


    Okay last stretch.  To review: The previous 5 questions helped get you into the mind set with the Bio, Given Circumstances, Objectives and justifying behaviors.  Now you may be saying, "This is just so much to be thinking about when I'm performing that it's not going to be natural."  But think about what makes us freeze up when talking in front of a large group of people -- when we don't know what to say and/or are unprepared.  When we tell ourselves to "relax", what happens?  We tense up even more.  It can't be helped.  By having something tangible to prepare, you'll be more confident and hence, more relaxed to play.


    These last 2 questions are the most important in terms of the actual acting built upon the "homework" the previous 5 questions have answered.  So here we go: 


    6) WHAT IS THE OBSTACLE?  What’s in the way of accomplishing my Immediate Objective?  If you’re not fighting for something, it’s nothing more than narration.


     


    Ex: If you want to "escape from your captor", your obstacle would be that your captor won't allow you to leave.  In the last half of "The Thomas Crown Affair", Pierce Brosnan has an arguement with Rene Russo and then she storms out the room.  In the take which made the final cut, the director told Pierce NOT to let her go --  no matter what.  And what transpired was this great scene with Rene really having to PRY herself away from him in order to achieve her objective.  Meanwhile it was in direct conflict of Pierce's objective - to keep her in the room.  There is no drama without conflict 


     


    7) WHAT DO I DO TO OVERCOME THE OBSTACLE?  Acting means using action verbs.  The act of doing.   Look for the actions.  Before each line of dialogue, assign it a verb: To (verb).


     


    Ex: If the scene is called for a Boy to ask out a Girl.  And her response is always "No".  He's not going to ask to same way the second, third or fourth time, even if the dialogue is exactly the same.  Same with for the Girl.     


     


    BOY: Will you go out with me?  (To Joke)


    GIRL: No. (To Evade)


    BOY: Will you go out with me? (To Flirt)


    GIRL: No. (To Demand)


    BOY: Will you go out with me?  (To Plead)


    GIRL: No. (To Lash)


     


    If the action is always the same, the dialogue will be monotone.  Again, you never ever want to be "left alone" or you will disappear off the stage/screen.  Actions give you something "doable" to do.  


     


    Like I said in the previous entries there are no "wrong" choices but there are stronger ones than others.  "To interrogate" is more interesting than "To ask".  "To Needle" is another way and "To Pierce" is yet another.  These should change with each line of dialogue or the energy will level off and your lines start sounding all the same.  You are always trying different ways to fight for your objective.  (Ex: A 4-year old will ask his mom for a toy.  When she says "no", he'll go to his dad.  If Dad says "no", he'll go to his grandparents.  I fhe still doesn't get his toy,  he'll whine, then pitch a fit -- always fighting for his goal.) Using a thesauruses is good.  The line “I hate you” can be To Joke, To Bond, To Lash – the more visual, the more powerful. 


     


    If you really did the assignment I assigned last session, that was a perfect example.  Ken Leung's character in "Keeping the Faith" wants to make a Karaoke Machine sale.  He tries all these actions (To Confront, To Befriend, To Plead, To Joke).  Ken's choice of his final action to make that sale was so different from all the other actors who auditioned.  That choice not only nabbed him the role but wound up being the funniest bit in the entire movie. 


     


    The rookie mistake is to work on the intonations of a sentence.  (ie: Will you go out with me?  Will you go out with me?  Will you go out with me?)  If a piece of dialogue is not working, chances are you don't know your action or just need to pick a stronger verb to illicit that performance from yourself that makes everyone nod their head saying, "Yes, that take felt right."  Because no matter what you say or how you say it, as long as you've done your homework, answered those 7 questions honestly, anyway you say the words will be the "right" way -- and the audience will get it. 


     


    An easy trick -- cross out all punctuation in the script.  That way the exclamation points and question marks don't lock you into the obvious ways of saying them.  (Ex: If the line was: "Look over there!"  As long as you have the right intentions in your head, you can drive home the same point with that line without having to yell it.  And give a more interesting spin on it than the rest.) 


     


    And then, just... listen.  And react.  If you're really listening to the other actor, and you know where your reponses are coming from -- it's like a great back and forth game of tennis.  And then your lines become easy to memorize because it's simply just a conversation.   


     


    After tuning up with a technique for years, like anything else, all this will eventually become second nature.  I can break down a script fairly quickly now but there are times when I need to fall back on these 7 questions. 


     


    The above technique is my foundation, specifically Stanislavsky/Uta Hagen/Lee Strasberg ie: "The Method".  There is another method called Meisner Technique or Stella Adler's teachings which falls under the belief that your own life experiences are not large enough to draw from, so you must use your imagination/improvisation.  In the end, you basically need to steal from both and make it into whatever works best for you.  But you need to know what the rules are first before you can break 'em.     


     


    A technique exists to put a name to what your instinct already wants to do so you can consciously repeat your choices and it not be a crap shoot. 


     


    Technique is also for the days when you don’t feel like doing the work.  Whether you're having a bad day or on Broadway doing the same stuff day in and day out for over a year -- you can perform on auto-pilot from the "homework" you've done and still give a fully realized performance.  So that even on your worst day, you're still better than most on their best day.


     


    These are the same lessons that I taught my H.S. Drama Students as well as my Master Program Students this summer.  And the great thing is that this process is the same for stage OR film - with only tiny adjustments.  After I did this lesson for a theatre student in the Master's Program, she said, "You just summarized 4 years of undergrad into 2 days."  I told her, " See?  I could've saved you over $40,000."     YOUR ASSIGNMENT: Putting this all into application.  Unless you do it, it won't become muscle memory.


     


    I usually start off my students with 1) Improvisation to learn how to play and use their natural instincts and then move them onto 2) The Technique mentioned above to hone that energy and sense of play.  And then after a few years of it becoming second nature, you know what the step after is?  3) Leaning to throw it out the window.  Because at a certain point, the acting will become too polished and will look over-analytical, stilited and wooden.


     


    You want to come into an audition room prepared but still loose.  But that's a lesson for another day.     Well, this concludes "Acting Skool".  Hope you got a little more insight into the inner workings of this crazy world of fake walls and people standing around saying lines of dialogue while others film it.

September 27, 2004

  • Acting Skool - Part II of III


    Okay class, settle down.  No James, we'll talk about that after class.  Alright, welcome back.  To review what we talked about last class, just scroll down.  We're now off and running to the next 3 questions to ask yourself when breaking down a scene.  And they are:


    3) WHAT IS MY RELATIONSHIP TO THE ENVIRONMENT?  Who are you talking to?  What’s your relationship to him/her?  If you're in an unfamiliar place, you'll act differently than if it’s your own house where things are second nature (light switches, doors, cupboards, etc.)  Your environment will feed you -- rehearse with a place in mind.  Small and specific.  You are never just "neutral" wherever you are.  If you see your mortal enemy around the corner, are you surprised to see him or actually hunting him down?  Your scene will play out differently depending on the Given Circumstances you've discovered in asking Question #2. 


     


    For monologues, it is important to know who you are talking to.  The person you are speaking to is just opting not to talk in this particular scene.  Each line is you speak is in response to a question they just asked (silently) or their facial expression.  This will give your performance different levels and not make it sound monotone. 


     


    4) WHAT IS MY OVERALL OBJECTIVE?  This question is the driving spine for the entire script.  You are constantly driving this objective through the other person.  It’s your mainline of intent.  Lengthy and wordy life goals are too general and vague.  Pick something specific so you can visualize it in your head.  Tom Hanks' character's overall objective in "Saving Private Ryan" was to probably: To Get Home.  He did many different things throughout the film to achieve that:  killing the enemy, securing a bunker, convincing his men to stay with the mission when they wanted to bail.  All those actions kept leading towards the mainline of intent: To Get Home.   


     


    5) WHAT'S MY IMMEDIATE OBJECTIVE?  Basically, what do you want from this person in this scene?  The Overall Objective is the skeleton for the entire movie.  The Immediate Objective is for right here & right now -- what do I want from this person now?  These will be the little actions leading towards the overall objective. 


     


    We always want something from someone else.  And it must matter if you get it or not from this person too -- otherwise what are the stakes?  This propels the scene.  It must be specific to connect you to the other person.  You never, ever, ever want someone to leave you alone, otherwise it just dissipates the scene.  You can want to "get away from the other person" or "push him away" because those are active things that force you to interact with your partner.  If you want him/her to "leave you alone", the one-sided scene will fall flat. 


     


    To make things easier, it helps tapping into similiar situations from your life.  All of our experiences are recorded in our memories.  And we can gain access to them on demand.   Using this, you’re asking, “What would I do in this circumstance?” and by using your own actions -- you’ll be a lot closer to the character.  Acting is about holding up a mirror to the world.  Everyone has gone through similar emotions/situations to varying levels.  If you use your real experiences and tap into them, it’ll help you get to the emotion that much quicker. 


     


    In my acting bag of tricks, I have written down 3 instances that I have experienced:  


    Love, Jealousy, Anger, Joy, Fear or Loss.  Those are the 6 universal emotions and any scene will fall into either one of those 6 categories in which I can zero in on.  The more specific my personal story is, the more universal it will become.


     


    (Ex 1):  A student of mine wrote for Joy: "Living my life on my own terms the way I want to."  I pointed out how vague that was, especially when you're trying to recall that during a performance.  Instead be specific like, "The time when I quit my job, told my boss where to shove his job and then got hired at the place I really wanted"  That's so much more viceral, immediate and easy to tap into.  Again, the more specific you make it for yourself, the more universal it becomes for everyone else to relate.  But it really has had to have happened to you in the past.


     


    (Ex 2):  Let's say you're playing an axe murderer.  Trying to think of how an axe murderer is like and getting into his head is going to be really hard.  It’s just going to be made up and fake (indicating).  Research would help but you could also just think of a time when you were Angry.  "The time when someone cut me off in traffic and I almost got into an accident".  Or "the time when a trail of ants just wouldn’t stop coming into my house."   Then you amp up that feeling 100 times and then you start to understand how a murderer might not being able to stand people and how he just wants to slay them all as easily as it would be to spray antd dead, without any regard for life.  You need to justify everything.  No villian is just bad for no reason.  The really good villians in films are so interesting because you can see where they're coming from.


     


    Okay, we'll stop here for today.  I know after these 2 entries you must be thinking, "Parry, I see so many of these teeny boppers in movies and TV shows on The WB and FOX working all the time.  Surely they don't do all that stuff, right?"  Well, you'd be right.  And although they're making a lot of money off their natural charm and personality,  you won't see them around in 3-5 years -- I guarantee it.  You can't always be playing "yourself".  And after awhile, the world will discover that they're unable to bring in a textured performance and are nothing more than a one-trick pony.  You can make a very good living at "winging" it but it won't last.  So save your earnings if that's your plan of action because it's got to last for 55+ years.  I'm talking long term here.  You have to remember that: 


     


    It's a marathon, not a sprint. 


     


    It's all about the journey and not the destination.  Being able to play and be silly in front of others is an extremely important trait and what I start my students off with first before actual technique through improvisation.  But unless you have a way to focus that natural instinct after a certain point, it's going to be hit and miss.  You want to be closer to the bullseye more often than not.  Plus if you're incapable of making your own choices, you'll be forever relying on line readings (people demonstrating to you how the line should "sound") during your entire career by others (directors/casting people) - hence them always making character choices for you.  Directors don't always know what they want and you'd be surprised at how many don't know how to illicit performances from actors without resorting to line readings or vague adjustments. 


     


    This is all to make yourself self-sufficent so that you always have your "A" game with you no matter who you work with.  Even if the project is a dud, you'll always be the interesting one and stand out. 


     


    Thanks for staying after class so long.  Next session we'll wrap it up and teach you the last 2 questions to ask that will pertain into the actual ACTING itself.  YOUR ASSIGNMENT: Rent "Keeping the Faith" (2000), select Chapter 18 titled "The Music Store" and watch Ken Leung's gut-busting scene.   Then select Director Ed Norton's commentary and watch the same scene for a great lesson about making choices that stand out from the rest in a 'not so great' movie.  Class dismissed!